The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset concept are essentially variations of the same theme.
They both trace their lineage to the Bilderberg Group’s objectives from the 1950s, which themselves are derived from technocratic aspirations of the 1930s.
In essence, these initiatives present a utopian vision for the world.
According to the UN, Sustainable Development is about meeting human development goals (whatever that means) while making sure natural systems can still provide the resources and services our economy and society depend on.
While their words might sound appealing, sort of, they are toxic.
What is Sustainable Development?
Sustainable Development, in reality, serves as a framework for global governance, mass control and mass surveillance, also known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, a term coined by Klaus Schwab. (Other terms are the Great Reset and Agenda 2030.)
The UN operates as a centralised public-private partnership, supported by most global governments, corporations, and NGOs. This gives it a huge advantage in shaping global policy and brings it closer to achieving global governance.
Global governance isn’t quite the same as a global government. A global government would mean a single entity controlling the world, while global governance means existing governments are centrally controlled or manipulated.
It doesn’t matter terribly much, though, since it all amounts to the same thing.
Conversation
Iain Davis offers an analysis of how the global power structure is configured and the role the UN plays within it.
Contrary to its name, Sustainable Development is neither about sustainability nor development. Rather, it serves as a global framework for the gradual introduction of neo-Marxist ideologies, technocratic objectives and centralised governance structures.
The concept of a ‘multipolar world‘, argues Iain, refers to a global order where power is distributed among multiple nations, such as the BRICS countries, as opposed to a unipolar world dominated by one or two major powers like the United States.
Sustainable development is a cover for a left-wing political agenda that seeks to undermine national sovereignty and impose global governance.
Lord Christopher Monckton
